In 80 days around the world - still doable?
Our take
There is something electric about a question that sounds impossible on paper but keeps you up at night anyway. When /u/Duudsmon posed the challenge of recreating Phileas Fogg's legendary 80-day journey using nothing but ships, trains, and the kind of on-the-fly ticket buying that would make any modern travel planner sweat, it hit that sweet spot where curiosity and ambition collide. Whether you are plotting a full-blown world tour or just trying to figure out if you need a transit visa through France to reach your third destination, Do i need transit visa to go through france to third destination ??, the spirit behind the question matters just as much as the answer. Even smaller-scale adventures like a trip to Italy in January or packing for the Baltics in late July remind us that travel planning is part craft, part gut feeling, and part willingness to roll with what the route throws at you.
The honest answer is that 80 days without air travel is somewhere between "technically possible" and "aggressively optimistic," and the gap between those two things is where the real adventure lives. Getting from Europe to Japan by rail and ship is absolutely doable today. The Trans-Siberian alone covers a massive chunk of ground, and plenty of ferries connect Japan to the mainland through Korea or Russia. Crossing North America by train and road is straightforward enough, and the infrastructure is forgiving. But the ocean crossings are where the dream hits a wall. Passenger cargo ships that actually traverse the Atlantic or Pacific on a regular commercial schedule are basically mythical creatures in 2024. You can find the occasional repositioning cruise or seasonal ferry, but a dedicated, bookable-at-the-counter crossing that slots into an 80-day window without requiring months of advance planning? That is the part that turns this from a fun thought experiment into a genuine logistical puzzle.
What makes this question so compelling is not really about the 80 days. It is about the constraint itself. When you strip away flights and pre-booked itineraries, you are left with something that feels rawer, messier, and more human. You are forced to depend on the rhythm of the places you pass through instead of the algorithm of a booking app. You are reading schedules at the station instead of downloading them to your phone. There is a boldness to that, an energy that feels closer to how travel actually used to feel before everything became optimized for convenience. The kind of spontaneity that makes you swap plans on a Tuesday morning because the ferry you stumbled into has a better vibe than the one you had penciled in.
So is it doable? Maybe not in a clean, predictable way. Maybe you end up stretching to 90 days or rerouting through the Panama Canal instead of trying to outrun the Atlantic. But the real answer is that the question itself is the destination. The moment you start mapping land routes and staring at ferry timetables with actual intention, you are already living the story. The only thing left is deciding whether you are going to chase it.
Hello,
while I am reading Jules Vernes novel "In 80 days around the world" I started to wonder if a world tour in a similar style is still doable today.
With similar style I mean the following requestions:
No airtravel. Planes were not invented yet so all travel was done by either ship, rail or other forms of land-based transport.
The journey can not be prearranged. Tickets for a part of the journey can not be bought online in order to have whole planned route fixed in advance. Preferably, tickets are bought section by section.
No depending on someone randomly taking you with you. Commercial services only. I mean that you can not be taken by a guy who is sailing across the Pacific with his private boat.
The Journey obviously needs to be completed in 80 days.
Starting in Europe I believe it is very much possible to get to at least to Japan while abiding to the requestitions.
Crossing North-America also seemes possible to me.
However, what is stressing me are the crossings of both the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean.
In order to cross the Atlantic Ocean I thought about a route via Greenland. Unfortunatly, I found no ferry connections from Canada.
Other routes do not come to mind. Similarly, crossing the Pacific seemes undoable.
I thought about taking a cargo ship and I know that some companies offer to take tourists on board but I found none offering Atlantic or Pacfic crossings.
Therefore my question:
Is a world tour without airtravel still doable and if so, in 80 days?
Thank you for your help! ❤️❤️❤️
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience