1 min readfrom Data Science

How to know if someone is lying on whether they have actually designed experiment in real life and not using the interview style structure with a hypothetical scenario?

Hi,

I was wondering as a manager how can I find if a candidate is lying about actually doing and designing experiments (a/b test) or product analytics work and not just using the structure people use in interview prep with a hypothetical scenario or chatgpt hypothetical answer they prepared before? (Like structure of you find hypothesis, power analysis, segmentation, sample size , decide validities, duration, etc.)

How to catch them? And do you care if they look suspicious but the structure is on the point? Can we over look? Or when its fine to over look? Bcz i know hiring is super crazy and people are finding hard to get job and they have to lie for survival as if they don’t they don’t get job most times?

submitted by /u/Starktony11
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#generative AI for data analysis
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#rows.com
#financial modeling with spreadsheets
#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#self-service analytics tools
#conversational data analysis
#predictive analytics in spreadsheets
#predictive analytics
#self-service analytics
#data analysis tools
#real-time data collaboration
#real-time collaboration
#lying
#experiment design
#A/B test
#catching deception
#product analytics
#hypothetical scenario
#hypothesis